Deborah Fishman focuses her practice on intellectual property, with a particular emphasis on biopharmaceutical and medical device patent litigation. She also handles antitrust, trade secret and general commercial disputes. Ms. Fishman has successfully represented Fortune 500 companies in business-critical patent cases and commercial disputes, and has litigated cases worth more than US$1 billion through trial.

As an IP litigator, Ms. Fishman has represented leading life sciences companies like Elan Pharmaceuticals, Olympus Surgical, and Amgen all aspects of complex patent litigation. Her experience includes bringing and defending patent infringement actions concerning biologic therapeutics (such as recombinant proteins and antibodies) and medical devices (such as bipolar surgical instruments and ophthalmic imaging techniques). Ms. Fishman is also registered to practice before the USPTO and has an active practice in post-grant contentious proceedings before the Patent Trials and Appeals Board, before district courts, and on appeal to the Federal Circuit.

Experience

  • Miotox as lead counsel to enforce the terms of a License Agreement related to the use of Botox® to treat migraine headaches and to defend patent counterclaims asserted by licensee Allergan. Miotox LLC v. Allergan, Inc., C.D.Cal. (2014-present).
  • Olympus America as lead counsel in defending a patent infringement action relating to bipolar surgical instruments in the Northern District of California, as well as in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) and before the Federal Circuit. Her team obtained entry of partial judgment of on-sale bar for one of the two patents-in-suit and cancelled claims of the other patent through inter partes review, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit on appeal. Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inv. v. Olympus America, Inc. et al., N.D.Cal., PTAB (2013-present).
  • AAT Bioquest as lead counsel to enforce its calcium ion indicator patent against a competitor. Her team obtained early summary judgment of no invalidity and no inequitable conduct and entry of permanent injunction. Following a bench trial, AAT Bioquest was awarded trebled lost profits damages. Her team also successfully  defended the district court’s judgment on appeal to the Federal Circuit.   AAT Bioquest v. TEFLabs Inc., N.D.Cal. (2014-present).
  • Elan Pharmaceuticals as lead counsel in defending a patent infringement suit involving a genetic mutation related to early onset Alzheimer’s Disease. Ms. Fishman’s team was hired as replacement counsel in March 2011 and, in August 2012, obtained summary judgment in Elan’s favor and dismissal with prejudice against Alzheimer’s Institute of America based on its lack of standing to assert the patents-in-suit. Most recently, Ms. Fishman and her team obtained an exceptional case award of attorneys’ fees from the N.D. Cal. court and is defending that award – more than 90% of the fees requested, on appeal to the Federal Circuit. Alzheimer’s Institute of America v. Elan Pharmaceuticals Inc., N.D.Cal. (2011-present).
  • Callidus as lead counsel in a patent infringement suit brought by Versata involving incentive compensation software. Her team challenged all of Versata’s asserted patents in five CBM proceedings before the PTAB and moved to stay district court proceedings. When the district court denied stay, her team successfully appealed to the Federal Circuit, which reversed the district court in a precedential opinion, identified by the Intellectual Property Owner’s Association as having a significant impact on patent law. At the same time, Callidus developed prior art defenses in the district court, and cross-asserted three patents. Ms. Fishman negotiated a global settlement and perpetual covenant not to sue. Versata v. Callidus Software Inc., D. Del., PTAB, Fed. Cir. (2012-2014).

  • Callidus as lead counsel in enforcing its patents and asserting business tort and breach of contract claims against its competitor. The case settled on favorable terms. Callidus Software v. Xactly Corporation, N.D.Cal. (2012-2013). 
  • Callidus as lead counsel in defending a patent infringement suit related to generic methods of symmetric encryption in the Eastern District of Texas, as well as in parallel proceedings before the PTAB. The case settled with a walk-away settlement for Callidus. TQP v. Callidus, E.D.Tex., PTAB (2013). 
  • Optovue as lead counsel in defending a patent infringement action relating to an ophthalmic imaging technique (optical coherence tomography) brought by a competitor against its core product line. Developed invalidity defense by nationalizing foreign inventor prior art, cross-asserted in-licensed patents, and prepared and filed ex parte reexamination proceedings that resulted in the cancellation of all claims of an assignor estoppel patent asserted in the litigation. Negotiated settlement on terms very favorable to Optovue. Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. v. Optovue, Inc., D. Del., D. Mass, SPTO (2010-2012). 
  • Fluxion Biosciences in defending a patent litigation in the Northern District of California and prosecuting three inter partes patent reexaminations and one ex parte patent reexamination before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on patents relating to microfluidics and high-throughput patch clamp technology. Cellectricon AB v. Fluxion Biosciences, N.D. Cal., USPTO (2010-2011). 
  • Amgen in enforcing its U.S. erythropoietin (EPO) patents against Roche first before the ITC and then in a patent litigation action before a jury. Took a lead role in preparing Amgen’s rebuttal validity case regarding obviousness and obviousness-type double patenting (“ODP”), including at a jury trial and in a bench hearing regarding ODP. The jury returned a verdict in Amgen’s favor on both infringement and validity for each of the asserted patents and the court entered final judgment and a permanent injunction in Amgen’s favor. Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman La-Roche Ltd., D. Mass, ITC, Fed. Cir. (2005-2008). 
  • Amgen in a contractual dispute with Johnson & Johnson regarding J&J’s demand to seek separate FDA licensure on Amgen’s recombinant EPO. Prepared and presented key contract witness at arbitration and assisted in the presentation and cross-examination of other witnesses at trial. Johnson & Johnson v. Amgen Inc. / Arbitration for Separate BLA (2004-2006). 
  • Amgen in enforcing its EPO patents against Hoechst Marion Roussel and TKT. Participated as a member of the trial team in a bench trial before the District Court of Massachusetts and assisted with appellate briefing. Amgen Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel (Aventis) and Transkaryotic Therapies (TKT), D.Mass., Fed. Cir. (1999-2001; 2003).

Recognition

The Legal 500 US
Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation (2016)
IAM Patent 1000
Litigation (2014-2016)
Managing Intellectual Property
Litigation (2014)
More

Credentials

Education
  • JD, Columbia Law School, 1998
  • BS, Stanford University, 1995
Admissions
  • California
  • US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • US District Court, Northern District of California
  • US District Court, Central District of California
  • US Patent and Trademark Office
Activities
  • Editor-In-Chief, BNA's Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook

  • Member, Patent Litigation Best Practices, Sedona Conference Working Group #10, Co-Chair of Bio-Pharma Drafting Group

  • Member, S.F. Bay Area Intellectual Property Inns of Court

Overview

Email Disclaimer